Everyone who’s conscious knows that Google,
Facebook, YouTube, and Twitter are in the tank for “progressivism”—also
known as “Cultural Regressivism that Undermines Decency” (CRUD). While
the hive at Google manipulates its algorithms to hide information that
regressives don’t like, Twitter, YouTube, and Facebook Overlords censor
with the kind of tyrannical oppression that in the good old days
liberals and radicals feared and loathed. Now that liberals and radicals
control the levers of power, they have abandoned all previous
philosophical commitments to freedom and liberty. A new explosive
undercover video by Project Veritas exposes the extraordinary and
deceitful machinations of Google to manipulate access to information in
order that regressivism can gain and maintain yet more power. In other
words, Google—like its fascistic government precursors—exploits its
monopolistic power to propagandize, thereby securing its iron grip on
power. Resistance is almost futile.
With his face and voice concealed, a Google insider warns about the
implications of the confluence of Google’s power, reach, and bias:
“What’s scary is that Google’s deciding what’s important and what’s not
important. They are… effectively deleting conversations from the
national narrative. It reminds me of… a book called 1984. That should
have been a warning…. Google’s… deciding what gets read, what gets
consumed, what people are able to click on, what appears. It reminds me
a lot of fascism…. When videos get pulled off of a platform, that’s… a
form of censorship…. People have no idea that it’s happening. They still
think that Google’s an objective source of information and it’s not.”
Secretly recorded conversations with Google executive Jen Gennai
reinforces the claims of the Google insider, further revealing Google’s
Leftist bias, arrogance, and determined efforts to use its power to
influence the next presidential election:
“The reason we launched our [Artificial Intelligence] principles is
because people were not …. saying what is fair and what’s equitable, so
we’re like, “Well, we are a big company. We’re going to say it.”… [M]y
definition of fairness and bias specifically talks about historically
marginalized communities, and that’s who I care about. Communities who
are in power, and have traditionally been in power, are not who I’m
solving fairness for. Our definition of fairness is one of those things
that we thought would be like obvious, and everybody would agree to, and
it wasn’t…. [T]he same people who voted for the current President did
not agree with our definition of fairness.”
Gennai’s/Google’s—let’s just say Gennoogle—Gennoogle’s definition of
fairness differs not only from the definition held by the “people who
voted for the current president” but also from the definition held by
many others. Many people understand “fairness” to mean “impartial or
just treatment without favouritism” or “the quality of treating people
equally.”
“Historically marginalized communities” refers to identity-peddlers’
four favourite categories of humans: blacks, women, homosexuals, and
cross-sex “passers.” Leftists like Gennoogle have been forced to add
“historically” to marginalized, since these groups have pushed from the
margins to the centre which will not hold.
Clearly Gennoogle has no interest in genuine fairness. “Fairness,” like
hatred, inclusivity, safety, tolerance, and equality, means exactly what
the googley Humpty Dumptys choose it to mean. Who cares if theologically
orthodox Christians or political conservatives are treated unfairly.
That’s their problem to solve, dagnabbit!
Gennai reveals the supreme arrogance of Google, which presumes to make
“things more fair” by supplanting the will of the people as expressed
through the duly elected executive and legislative branches of the
government with Gennoogle’s reconceptualization of “fairness”:
“The White House and Congress won’t play a role in making things more
fair, so people are holding us accountable to fill the gap of what
should be done.”
Gennai makes clear the presumptive supremacy of the Google hive mind
over the elected representatives of the people:
“We got called in front of Congress multiple times, and we’ve not shown
up because we’re like, we just know they’re going to just attack us.
We’re not going to change our mind. There’s no point in just sitting
there being attacked over something that we know we’re not going to
change…. They can pressure us, but we’re not changing.”
Gennai adds more flesh to the bones hinted at in her allusion to Trump,
his supporters, and “fairness”:
“Elizabeth Warren is saying that we should break up Google…. [S]he’s
very misguided. That will not make it better, it will make it worse
because now all these smaller companies who don’t have the same
resources that we do will be charged with preventing the next Trump
situation…. a small company cannot do that.”
“We all got screwed over in 2016…. so now we’ve rapidly been like, “What
happened there? How do we prevent it from happening again?”
Evidently in panic mode after the exposé was released, Gennai penned a
futile effort to recast her damning words and malign Project Veritas:
“These people lied about their true identities, filmed me without my
consent, selectively edited and spliced the video to distort my words
and the actions of my employer, and published it widely online.”
While Google engages in unconscionable, secretive efforts to manipulate
public opinion and to silence conservative employees through fear of
loss of employment, she’s outraged about being secretly recorded?
Surely a smart human like Gennai knows that all documentaries and
exposés “selectively” edit. The ethical issue is not whether an exposé
is selectively edited. The ethical issue is whether it was edited in
such a way as to distort someone’s words. Gennai tries to prove that
Project Veritas distorted her words about the 2016 election, saying she
never suggested Google objected to Trump’s election per se but rather to
“foreign interference”:
“In a casual restaurant setting, I was explaining how Google’s Trust and
Safety team (a team I used to work on) is working to help prevent the
types of online foreign interference that happened in 2016.”
If Gennoogle’s concern were really with online foreign interference,
what sense did her statement about being “screwed” mean, since Russian
attempts at foreign interference didn’t affect the election outcome.
Leftists like Gennoogle believe they were “screwed” by Trump’s winning.
They were not “screwed” by Russian attempts to interfere. Does Gennai
think all Americans just fell off the turnip truck?
Project Veritas asked the Google insider about the meaning of this
statement from an internal Google document:
“In some cases, it may be appropriate to take no action if the system
accurately affects current reality. While in other cases, it may be
desirable to consider how we might help society reach a more fair and
equitable state via product intervention.”
The Google insider translated into plain English what “helping society”
looks like in the Google hive:
“What they want to do is they want to act as gatekeepers between the
user and the content that they’re trying to access. They’re going to
come in, they’re going to filter the content. They’re going to say,
“Actually, we don’t want to give the user access to that information
because it’s going to create an outcome that’s undesirable to us.”
This exposé will come as no surprise to former Google employee Mike
Wacker, recently fired for publicly criticizing Google’s “outrage mobs
and witch hunts.” Wacker shared that the Google outrage mobs (OMs)
demanded Google have nothing to do with the conservative Heritage
Foundation, calling its president Kay Cole James the Grand Wizard of the
KKK. For those who don’t know, Kay Cole James is black and endured
egregious racist attacks when growing up.
You may wonder exactly how the OMs could justify calling a black woman
the Grand Wizard of the KKK. Well, this particular OM has concluded,
apparently with no scientific proof, that masquerading as the opposite
sex is analogous to race, and, therefore, opposing things like co-ed
restrooms and locker rooms—which the Heritage Foundation does—is
analogous to racism.
Wacker revealed that one Google employee was reported to Human Resources
(HR) for sharing a National Review article, and another was reported for
appearing “to be promoting and defending Jordan Peterson’s comments
about transgender pronouns,” which allegedly made some Google employee
“feel unsafe at work.” #eyeroll
What other subjective, often-changeable feelings will Google OMs
conclude are analogous to race? Will those employees who disagree with
the hive’s assumptions about those other feelings be safe in that
“nonpartisan,” inclusive space to express their views? And what if the
OMs are wrong? What if cross-sex identification, cross-sex
hormone-doping, surgical mutilation, and co-ed private spaces are, in
reality, neither good nor right?
While Wacker lost his job, Blake Lemoine retains his job as senior
software engineer at Google. The name Blake Lemoine may sound familiar.
He made the news in 2018 for calling Tennessee Congresswoman Marsha
Blackburn a terrorist for writing an op-ed critical of the obvious bias
against conservatives and Republicans within tech companies like Google
and Facebook.
Wacker reports that in internal Google employee forums, Lemoine also
said this:
“If you think that trans women aren’t women then you can either keep it
to yourself or GTFO [Get the ***k out]. Google’s corporate policies are
crystal clear on that.”
While Google employees are free to say that “transwomen”—who are
objectively, immutably, scientifically verifiably men—are women, others
are not permitted to say “transwomen” are men. Deviate from the deviant
narrative and off with your head!
Trouble seems to follow Lemoine—who identifies variously as a pagan
priest and Gnostic Christian—wherever he goes. The “bisexual” Lemoine
who is in a “non-monogamous” relationship with his wife enlisted in the
U.S. Army in 2003 and then in 2004 “realized he did not like working
with U.S. Army troops.” When the Army refused to allow him “to quit the
Army,” he went on a work strike and then a hunger strike. He was
court-martialed and discharged for bad conduct.
Before whistle-blower Mike Wacker, there was former Google engineer
James Damore who was fired in 2017 after he wrote and distributed a
measured internal memo replete with evidence in which he criticized
Google for, among other things, being “an ideological echo chamber.”
Can’t have any Google employee pointing out that the emperor brooks no
dissent.