Headlines on Drudge Report and Breitbart shouted out the dire news:
APPLE REGULATES ‘HATE.’ And, MASTERS OF THE UNIVERSE: FACEBOOK APPLE
PURGE INFOWARS FOR ‘HATE SPEECH.’
Over on Twitter, Paul Joseph Watson, one of the leading contributors to
Infowars, raised his voice in protest and warning: “Facebook has
permanently BANNED Infowars. For unspecified ‘hate speech.’ They didn’t
even tell us what the offending posts were. This sets a chilling
precedent for free speech. To all other conservative news outlets – you
are next. The great censorship purge has truly begun.”
He added, “Whatever you think of Infowars, they’re coming for you next.”
Now, I’ve mentioned before that, by and large, I am not a fan of
Infowars (although Watson’s takedowns of the radical left are often
bitingly on target). At the same time, I’ve stated that YouTube’s
conflict with Infowars (the precursor to the current attack) should
concern us all.
But let’s leave Infowars out of the picture for the moment. Let me share
with you some recent examples of Facebook and Twitter and YouTube coming
against conservative speech. You can draw your own conclusions.
1) Facebook blocks Professor Robert Gagnon. In advance of the
controversial Revoice conference, Prof. Gagnon posted some very valid,
fair-minded concerns on his Facebook page.
For those of you who don’t know Prof. Gagnon, he is a respected academic
and is neither a name-caller nor a hate-speaker. His book on
homosexuality and the Bible is the most authoritative work of its kind,
with endorsements from a wide range of leading scholars.
As a result of his post, which under no balanced evaluation can be
considered hateful or discriminatory, he was temporarily blocked by
Facebook.
In contrast, Christian-bashing, Bible-hating, God-mocking pages abound
on Facebook
2) Facebook does not allow a Christian family organization to boost two
of their posts. The Illinois Family Association (IFA) attempted to pay
to boost two of their recent posts. The first asked the question, “Will
‘Progressives’ Affirm Identity of Christ-Followers?”
And the post contained this statement: “In the service of tolerance,
comity, and consistency, will ‘progressives,’–including homo-activists,
‘trans’-cultists, and the government–accommodate, affirm, and celebrate
our identity [as Christians] and protect our right to live in accordance
with it?”
After waffling on the issue, Facebook finally informed IFA that they
would not be allowed to pay money to advertise this post.
One week later, Facebook informed IFA that they would not be allowed to
boost this post, which asked, “Is ANYONE Affected by ‘Trans’ Deviance?”
The article raised concerns, such as: “Parents are raising babies to
have no ‘gender identification.’ They’re concealing their children’s
sex—a fundamental and profoundly meaningful anthropological fact—from
family, friends, and even the toddlers themselves.” Such speech must not
be promoted!
So, Facebook will not allow the IFA to advertise their posts, even to
like-minded conservatives.
3) Twitter blocks a conservative for mimicking the tweets of an
unblocked, radical leftist. As reported on the Right Scoop, “Sarah Jeong
has been a pretty buzzworthy topic this week, even making it onto the
Sunday morning talk shows, after a bunch of tweets hating white people
and cops were uncovered and her new employer, the New York Times, was
very not upset by them.
“On Twitter this weekend, Turning Points USA’s Candace Owens tried
something. She tweeted the same things that Jeong tweeted, to find out
if she would be punished even though Jeong was not.”
So, Sarah Jeong, who is guilty of hate speech, got a free pass from
Twitter (and the New York Times) for posting horrific comments about
white people. Then, to make a point, Candace Owens, a conservative black
woman, took Jeong’s own words but substituted “Jewish people” for “white
people.”
And she was totally clear in what she did, adding in the very same
tweet: “The above statements are from @nytimes editor @sarahjeong. I
simply swapped out the word ‘white’ for ‘Jewish’.”
In response, she was temporarily blocked by Twitter, which, as you know,
takes hate speech very seriously. (This is a great place for your own
sarcastic reply.)
After an uproar of protest against Twitter, her account was quickly
reinstated. (Note that Owens did the same thing in another tweet,
substituting “black” for “white.” Point proved.)
4) YouTube refuses to allow my ministry to advertise one of my videos.
We have already documented our battle with YouTube and Google over our
video “Can You Be Gay and Christian?”
It would be difficult to approach this controversial subject with a more
loving and gracious tone than we did. But because of an aggressive LGBT
campaign against the video, YouTube not only demonetized it (which means
that regardless of how many times it is viewed, it cannot generate
income). YouTube/Google also informed us that we will not be allowed to
advertise it – meaning, at our expense, to like-minded viewers. “Thou
shalt not advertise biblical content that offends!”
(If you haven’t watched the video yet, please do, and give it a thumbs
up. This helps combat the LGBT activists who have swarmed the video with
hateful comments and with thumbs down responses.)
What, then, should we make of this? What of the fact that
radical-leftist, highly-bigoted groups like the SPLC are helping these
internet giants make their decisions?
Let me repeat what I said in my earlier article about Infowars: Whether
you’re an Infowars fan or you find their work distasteful, their
potential removal from YouTube should concern you.
Otherwise, soon enough, we’ll have our own version of Martin Niemöller’s
famous poem, which will now sound something like this:
First, they came for Infowars, and I did not speak out—because I found
them offensive.
Then they came for Geller and Spencer, and I did not speak out—because
I found them obnoxious.
Then they came for Prager U, and I did not speak out—because I found
them opinionated.
Then they came for a host of others, and I did not speak out—because I
have my own life to live.
Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me.
You have been forewarned.
_________________
[ And this gospel of the kingdom will be preached in the whole world (via the internet? ... Keygar) as a testimony to all nations, and (when it can no longer be preached due to censorship? ... Keygar) THEN the end will come” (Matthew 24:14) ... Keygar ]