The Australian Green Party has now assumed the balance of power in the
Australian Senate, allowing them great potential power in policy making.
The Greens, founded in 1992, are traced back to the 1970’s Club of Rome era
United
Tasmanian Group, the world’s first “green” party. Their moniker is
self-explanatory, the basis of their charter being ecology and the
environmental
movement.
Green Party principles state that global warming, er, climate change is
the greatest threat to humanity with only ten to fifteen years remaining to
provide
a solution. “Australia is ideally placed to lead the world in this
challenge and
the Greens are committed to Australia taking that lead.”[1]They also
want to limit CO2 and eliminate coal use, despite the fact that
CO2 is not a
pollutant.
Furthermore, they want to establish a “low-carbon economy” and force nations to sign binding environmental treaties restructuring the whole of society, economy and politics. They state “climate change will result in the displacement of people, creating environmental refugees and intensifying the threat of regional and global conflict.”[2].
In actuality, climate change policy will result in great displacement,
mass
impoverishment and genocide. Much has been said by real scientists on
these
issues such as the Sky Dragon Slayers, Piers Corbyn, Anthony Watts
and thousands of others. The policy documents from the Club of
Rome and the United Nations to Ecoscience detail their true agenda, in their own
words. Historian and
economist
Webster Tarpley recently gave a lecture dissecting this documentation
revealing
their agenda of deindustrialization, mass involuntary sterilization,
global
depopulation and the establishment of what they call a “planetary
regime” or
what Senator Brown calls a “world parliament.”[3] India is already
giving away
cars in exchange for male and female sterilization.[4]
Senator Brown: World Government is Real, No Conspiracy Theory
Australian Green leader, Senator Bob Brown, recently unveiled his hope
for a
“world parliament.” [5] Corporate commentators and spineless journalists
proclaim the idea of a world parliament is something now to be treated
seriously, not laughed at.[6] Authors and researchers discussing long
laid out
plans for world parliament and critical of the movement, consistently
having
been right on the money, have been laughed at for so long and
called
derogatory
terms. Now we are to stop laughing and take it serious,
for the time of
world
government is nigh.
Senator Brown believes we are inevitably moving toward a world
community
or
“global, uh, parliamentary...governance” while deriding
conspiracy talk.
One
will notice how all politicians who make public mention
of this agenda
always
stutter before they proclaim “global, uh, governance.”
On a personal
note, I was
given similar treatment. In university, one of my
professors (a
psychologist)
had summoned my classmate and me for coffee. Strange, but we realized he
had
been secretly evaluating our sanity due to the matters we were
discussing in
class. Upon complaining to the university head, we were given a final
lecture by
the latter. He derided conspiracy talk and such. However, he then went
on to
state that there was nothing wrong with or believing in a “world state”,
that it would be here in five, ten or fifteen years.
Hence, the tactic is to
label any critic as crazy. The fact that there can be no debate as to the
viability of
world government de facto demonstrates its undemocratic nature. It does
not
matter that the majority do not want it, they will get it.
Though Senator Brown’s party voted against invading Iraq and
Afghanistan, he
goes on to state that “if we can invade Iraq and Afghanistan in the name
of
democracy, surely we can peacefully get behind moves to have a global
governance.”[7] He adds a cherry on top by furthering that the Tobin Tax
would
end poverty. He is right, there is a pattern. The Iraq war was an
outright lie,
where the Bush Administration fabricated evidence and put into force war
plans
long drawn up. Afghanistan saw them go after a non-existing boogeyman,
even on
their own payroll, to fulfill Sir Halford Mackinder’s and Zbigniew
Brzezinski’s
plan to dominate the Heartland and cull the world’s heroin profits.
In
similar
vein, global warming, I mean, climate change is based on fabricated
intelligence
and ulterior motives.
Walter Russell Mead writes in a recent essay, that a Global Green Carbon Treaty
(GGCT) "is less a treaty than a constitution for global
government. The
green
plan is a plan for a global constitution because the
treaty will
regulate
economic production in every country on earth."[8]
Australia could be providing model climate framework just as the
European Union
laid the foundational model for regional integration, with its
“extensive
experience at the regional level” that is being drawn upon to integrate
Africa, the Americas, the Middle East and Asia via “the Pan-African Parliament,
the Mercosur Parliament and there is also the Parliamentary Assembly of the
Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe that includes 56
states and
stretches from Vancouver to Vladivostok.”[9] Australia is
attempting to
spearhead the establishment of the carbon tax and other
climate policy
even as
the EU Carbon Climate Exchange collapses, just as it
did in Chicago.[10]
Notes:
[1] "Climate Change and Energy." The Greens.
<https://greens.org.au/policies/climate-change-and-energy/climate-change-and-energy>.
[2] Ibid.
[3] Tarpley, Webster G. "The Elite's Plan for Global Extermination."
YouTube. 26
Apr. 2011. <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T3Eo2YTQUr8>.
[4] "India: Rajasthan in 'cars for Sterilisation' Drive." BBC. 1 July
2011.
<https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-south-asia-13982031>.
[5] "Australia Should Support Efforts for a Global Parliament: Green
Party
Leader." Campaign for a UN Parliament. 30 June 2011.
[6] Carr, Andrew. "Why Not a World Parliament?" The Interpreter | Lowy
Institute
for International Policy. 30 June 2011.
[7] Ibid.
[8] Mead, Walter Russell. "The Failure of Al Gore: Part Deux." The
American
Interest Blog Directory. 27 June 2011.
<https://blogs.the-american-interest.com/wrm/2011/06/27/the-failure-of-al-gore-part-deux>.
[9] See note 5.
[10] Maher, Sid. "As EU Carbon Price Slumps, Labor Offers 'battler
Buffer' | The
Australian." The Australian. 28 June 2011.
(see HERE for global warming facts )